Minutes, IBIS Quality Committee 02 October 2012 11:00-12:00 EST (08:00-09:00 PST) ROLL CALL Cisco Systems: Tony Penaloza Ericsson: * Anders Ekholm Green Streak Programs: Lynne Green Huawei Technologies: Guan Tao IBM: Bruce Archambeault Greg Edlund Intel * Michael Mirmak IOMethodology: * Lance Wang Mentor Graphics: John Angulo Micron Technology: Moshiul Haque, Randy Wolff Nokia Siemens Networks: Eckhard Lenski QLogic Corp.: James Zhou Signal Consulting Group: Tim Coyle Signal Integrity Software * Mike LaBonte Teraspeed Consulting Group: * Bob Ross Texas Instruments: Pavani Jella Everyone in attendance marked by * NOTE: "AR" = Action Required. -----------------------MINUTES --------------------------- Mike LaBonte conducted the meeting. Call for opens and IBIS related patent disclosures: - None AR Review: - Mike produce starter set of test waveforms - Done - Michael M: Is this for correlating or could models be created from them? - Mike L: These are contrived models - Lance check on patent status for correlation methods - Spoke with attorney last week - Needs to check with status in China - No issues in U.S. New items: Possible presentation for upcoming Asia summit meetings: - Bob: Lance is doing a quality related presentation - We probably have no need Set of waveforms to use in comparing different correlation metrics: - Mike showed the waveforms - Bob: I would prefer single ended waveforms - Mike showed the previous FOM presentation - Mike: It would be good to have an FOM that clearly differentiates between good and bad - Anders: It sounds like you are looking for measurement of specific features - Mike: We might as a group decide on acceptable quality levels - The waveforms could be set to be at the threshold - Bob: That would be subjective - Mike showed David Banas' 2007 summit presentation - Mike: This does not produce a single number FOM - Maybe different thresholds are needed for each parameter - Anders: What are we trying to achieve? - Mike: We need a standard metric for models we produce - Anders: Any standard should have a tool behind it - The FOM produces values that are too high - Mike created a new test waveform with a long flat period - Mike: The IBIS FOM - Anders: The flat period is of less consequence - FSV might be better, but we have to decide how to measure the features - Anders: AMI is still not stable enough to do a check list - Mike: We may have a long wait before there is any change - Anders: Is Dependency Table in 5.1? - Mike: No - Anders: It will not be simple to check AMI models - Anders: We check that models fall within the process corner envelope - Lance: It would be good to have CSV for each of these test waveforms. AR: Mike post spreadsheet plus CSV files to web archive AR: Mike add FOM to spreadsheet AR: Mike contact David Banas for an update on his FSV method Review of group meeting schedule: - Lance: There might be more interest if we worked on golden waveforms Next meetings: - Next meetings Oct 16 and Oct 30 - Meeting ended at 12:10 ET